Cultural Perspectives on Sex Therapy: Breaking Taboos in the Chinese Australian Community
Hailey Lin and Ronald Hoang, psychosexual therapists with Chinese backgrounds, work to demystify sex and intimacy for their community in Australia.
Hailey Lin, a 33-year-old clinical psychosexual therapist based in Sydney, has maintained her profession as a secret from her extended family.
While her mother in Hong Kong describes Lin's role as that of a social worker involved in 'psychotherapy things', Lin’s actual focus is on aiding individuals in exploring their sexual and relational health.
Lin, who has a unique position as one of the few therapists in Australia with a Chinese background specializing in psychosexual therapy, emphasizes the importance of sex education within the community.
She notes a cultural hesitance surrounding the discussion of sex and intimacy in Asian societies.
Despite her mother's conservative stance, Lin's family remains supportive of her work.
Similarly, Ronald Hoang, a 36-year-old relationship and family therapist, faced challenges growing up in a Vietnamese-Chinese Australian family, where expectations often leaned toward more traditional professions such as medicine and law.
His career path into therapy, dedicated to helping couples navigate intimacy and family dynamics, remains somewhat elusive to his mother, who still struggles to understand his work, referring to it as helping 'crazy people'.
According to the 2021 Census, Australia is home to approximately 4,026 psychotherapists, among which only 80 are proficient in Mandarin, Cantonese, or other Chinese dialects.
Furthermore, just 42 of these therapists hail from regions such as China, Hong Kong, Macau, or Taiwan, underscoring a scarcity of culturally and linguistically relevant therapy services available to Chinese Australians.
Lin and Hoang report a growing demand for their services, particularly from Asian clients who find comfort in their shared cultural backgrounds.
Hoang notes an increase in his Asian Australian clientele, with many expressing that he can relate to their experiences better due to his cultural heritage.
They value the ability to open up more freely, perceiving Lin and Hoang as individuals who can genuinely understand the complexities of their cultural narratives.
Lin highlights that for many clients, discussing sexual matters feels akin to speaking a foreign language.
They often lack familiarity with therapy processes, sometimes expecting immediate solutions similar to medical prescriptions.
Through her practice, Lin aims to bridge these gaps in understanding, aiming to clarify how therapy functions and to normalize discussions about sex within an ostensibly conservative framework.
Additionally, Lin observes that traditional values concerning family loyalty frequently surface in therapy sessions, especially with clients who have backgrounds as migrants.
She posits that intergenerational trauma is more prevalent within these communities, necessitating specialized therapeutic approaches.
There exists a common stereotype that Asian cultures are innately conservative regarding sexual matters, which Lin contest, asserting that discomfort around discussing sex transcends cultural boundaries.
She points to inadequate sex education in many Asian countries, which often focuses on biological aspects without addressing broader topics such as consent and pleasure.
Lin asserts that even if discussions about sex are encouraged at home or in educational settings, they often center around negative messages, advising abstinence rather than encouraging open conversations about sexuality as a positive aspect of life.
Hoang mentions that shame often acts as a significant barrier for Chinese individuals when engaging in discussions about sex.
He elaborates on the role of shame within Asian cultures, suggesting it leads individuals to conceal themselves and their realities rather than seek openness in relationships.
As both Lin and Hoang continue their work, they recognize their unique responsibility to demystify sex and relationships for their communities, challenging the stigma often associated with such conversations.
Hoang notes that societal pressures can create false expectations about sexual experiences, particularly in committed relationships, and emphasizes the need for understanding that relationships can have varying dynamics, akin to seasonal changes.
Both therapists advocate for clear communication as a cornerstone of enriching intimate relationships.
They stress that open discussions can transform perceptions of sexuality and help alleviate anxiety surrounding intimate experiences.
Lin additionally supports the idea of the 'good-enough sex model', suggesting that accepting variances in intimacy can lead to healthier relationships.
Newsletter
Related Articles