Elon Musk Criticizes Trump's Tax and Spending Bill Post-Administration Departure
Musk's remarks intensify discussions among Republicans regarding federal spending priorities as a controversial bill advances.
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has publicly criticized President Donald Trump's expansive tax and spending bill shortly after concluding his formal role in the Trump administration.
In a post on the social media platform X, Musk characterized the legislation as a 'disgusting abomination' that will significantly contribute to the federal deficit.
The bill, passed by the House of Representatives last month with a narrow margin, aims to extend the 2017 tax cuts championed by Trump during his initial term.
According to projections from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the measure is expected to increase the national debt by US$3.8 trillion, adding to the existing federal debt of approximately US$36.2 trillion.
The Senate, controlled by the Republican Party, is anticipated to consider the measure, known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' in the coming month, although revisions to the House-passed version are expected.
Musk's comments have ignited a debate within the Republican Party regarding spending priorities and fiscal responsibility.
House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune have publicly defended the bill and expressed disapproval of Musk's statements.
Johnson described Musk's calculations as erroneous, emphasizing his disappointment with the billionaire's stance.
Conversely, Musk received support from some Republican members who echoed his concerns.
Representatives Thomas Massie and Warren Davidson, both critics of the proposed legislation, publicly endorsed Musk's views on the social media platform.
Senator Mike Lee, a prominent advocate for strict spending cuts among Republicans, also aligned with Musk's critique, urging party members to leverage the Trump bill as a means to address the national deficit.
Musk's previous involvement in the Trump administration as a special government employee tasked with leading initiatives for cost-cutting and efficiency ended last week, after which he expressed his frustration over the current legislation's financial implications.