High Court Upholds Landmark Native Title Case for Gumatj Clan
The Commonwealth faces potential compensation claims after a significant ruling in favor of the Gumatj clan regarding bauxite mining rights.
The High Court of Australia recently upheld a landmark native title case initiated by the late land rights leader Yunupingu, representing the Gumatj clan, against the Commonwealth.
The decision affirms the Gumatj people's claims to native title over land in the Gove Peninsula, which has significant implications for compensation concerning past mining activities.
In a statement following the ruling, Djawa Yunupingu, brother of the late leader, expressed that "fair justice has been served in this country for my people and the people of Northeast Arnhem Land." He credited his brother's leadership in the case, highlighting its importance for the future of the Gumatj clan.
The case originated from the Commonwealth's actions in 1968 when it permitted bauxite mining in northeast Arnhem Land without obtaining consent from the Traditional Owners.
In 2019, Yunupingu filed for native title on behalf of the Gumatj clan, alongside a compensation application for the impacts of various executive and legislative acts occurring between 1911 and 1978.
Yunupingu claimed compensation under section 51 (xxxi) of the Australian Constitution, which mandates that the government must provide just terms compensation for the acquisition of property.
Following his death in April 2023, the case continued, and in May 2023, the Federal Court ruled in favor of Yunupingu's claims.
Subsequently, the Commonwealth was granted leave to appeal at the High Court.
During the High Court proceedings, Commonwealth solicitor-general Stephen Donaghue warned that the government could face substantial compensation liabilities if the appeal were unsuccessful.
The appeal raised concerns that the ruling could invalidate Northern Territory land grants dating back over a century.
Several clan groups, including the Rirratjingu, have expressed support for the Gumatj due to overlapping claims in the region, particularly regarding mineral rights.
The land in question has been the site of bauxite mining since the Commonwealth entered into a lease agreement with Nabalco, which is now held by Swiss Aluminium.
Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus acknowledged Yunupingu's significant contribution to the case, expressing that the High Court ruling clarifies key constitutional issues.
He noted that the matter would return to the Federal Court to address further complexities, specifically surrounding compensation amounts.
Kado Muir, chair of the National Native Title Council, praised the Gumatj clan's victory and underscored the constitutional entitlement to compensation for Traditional Owners when their sacred lands are appropriated.
He clarified that the High Court's ruling did not determine the compensation amount, which will be assessed by the Federal Court.
Jamie Lowe, the council's chief executive, emphasized that the decision reflects the recognition and protection of native title under Australian law and the Constitution.
He indicated that it presents an opportunity for economic empowerment for communities with historical grievances regarding land dispossession.
Sean Bowden, part of the Gumatj legal team, remarked that the decision upholds the rights of Traditional Owners across the Northern Territory who have suffered due to government actions affecting their lands.
Bowden praised Yunupingu’s foresight and dedication in initiating the legal action, emphasizing the importance of this case for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples across Australia.