Focus on the BIG picture.
Tuesday, Jun 10, 2025
Outside the box.
US Military to Deploy Marines to Los Angeles Amid Protests
About 700 Marines are being sent to Los Angeles to assist local law enforcement as tensions rise from ongoing protests.
The Pentagon is preparing to deploy approximately 700 Marines to Los Angeles as part of a response to escalating protests in the city.
According to a U.S. official, a battalion is expected to arrive within the next 24 hours to assist local law enforcement, while additional National Guard troops are also being mobilized.
The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, stated that the situation remains fluid and that the deployment is intended only for support roles, as the Insurrection Act is not expected to be invoked at this time.
The recent protests in Los Angeles have been largely triggered by public outrage over immigration enforcement actions, which have led to civil unrest in various parts of the city.
Demonstrators have voiced their opposition to the federal government's aggressive immigration policies, leading to a series of confrontations.
Former President Donald Trump acknowledged the situation during a recent event, indicating that he believes the protests were heading in a dangerous direction.
He noted that while he does not categorize the events as an insurrection, they “could have led to one.” Trump’s comments on deploying military support have sparked significant political discourse, prompting responses from local leaders and state officials.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has criticized Trump’s decision to deploy the National Guard without consulting the state.
Newsom described the move as an “unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,” arguing that it infringes upon state sovereignty and exacerbates tensions.
The governor announced plans to file a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that the action is unconstitutional due to the lack of state consent.
As part of the escalating response, the self-driving taxi service Waymo has temporarily halted operations in downtown Los Angeles, citing safety concerns following incidents where some of its vehicles were vandalized and burned during the protests.
Prominent officials and representatives have voiced strong opposition to the militarization of local law enforcement with some warning that this could politicize the military and impact its standing in domestic matters.
Former military leaders have noted that federalizing the National Guard contrary to state wishes could lead to a damaging precedent.
In response to criticism, California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated that the mobilization of troops was an unnecessary escalation, emphasizing that local law enforcement is fully capable of managing the situation.
Additional nationwide protests have been announced in response to Trump’s recent actions, reflecting widespread unease about the heavy-handed approach to governance.
Organizers have indicated a significant uptick in planned events across the country, highlighting a collective rejection of perceived authoritarian measures.
As tensions continue to rise both in Los Angeles and in broader national contexts, the situation remains under close scrutiny, with potential implications for civil liberties and community relations going forward.
According to a U.S. official, a battalion is expected to arrive within the next 24 hours to assist local law enforcement, while additional National Guard troops are also being mobilized.
The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, stated that the situation remains fluid and that the deployment is intended only for support roles, as the Insurrection Act is not expected to be invoked at this time.
The recent protests in Los Angeles have been largely triggered by public outrage over immigration enforcement actions, which have led to civil unrest in various parts of the city.
Demonstrators have voiced their opposition to the federal government's aggressive immigration policies, leading to a series of confrontations.
Former President Donald Trump acknowledged the situation during a recent event, indicating that he believes the protests were heading in a dangerous direction.
He noted that while he does not categorize the events as an insurrection, they “could have led to one.” Trump’s comments on deploying military support have sparked significant political discourse, prompting responses from local leaders and state officials.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has criticized Trump’s decision to deploy the National Guard without consulting the state.
Newsom described the move as an “unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,” arguing that it infringes upon state sovereignty and exacerbates tensions.
The governor announced plans to file a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that the action is unconstitutional due to the lack of state consent.
As part of the escalating response, the self-driving taxi service Waymo has temporarily halted operations in downtown Los Angeles, citing safety concerns following incidents where some of its vehicles were vandalized and burned during the protests.
Prominent officials and representatives have voiced strong opposition to the militarization of local law enforcement with some warning that this could politicize the military and impact its standing in domestic matters.
Former military leaders have noted that federalizing the National Guard contrary to state wishes could lead to a damaging precedent.
In response to criticism, California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated that the mobilization of troops was an unnecessary escalation, emphasizing that local law enforcement is fully capable of managing the situation.
Additional nationwide protests have been announced in response to Trump’s recent actions, reflecting widespread unease about the heavy-handed approach to governance.
Organizers have indicated a significant uptick in planned events across the country, highlighting a collective rejection of perceived authoritarian measures.
As tensions continue to rise both in Los Angeles and in broader national contexts, the situation remains under close scrutiny, with potential implications for civil liberties and community relations going forward.
