Pamela Jo Bondi, the 87th United States Attorney General and former Attorney General of Florida, offered a sharp condemnation of the impeachment proceedings led by House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff.

In a powerful address to Congress, Bondi criticized Schiff’s management of the process, revealing what she labeled as unconstitutional actions, partisan manipulation, and a blatant neglect of due process.

Bondi underscored how Schiff and his supporters held secret hearings, excluding vital witnesses and preventing agency counsel from participating—actions that legal experts contend violated fundamental constitutional rights.

She noted that the House committee selectively issued subpoenas yet neglected to enforce them, later insisting that the Senate act on them despite their own failure to do so.

Bondi directly targeted Schiff’s repetitive allegations that the White House was involved in a cover-up.

She maintained that it was Schiff who withheld essential evidence and obstructed a fair hearing.

Bondi argued that Schiff’s impeachment efforts were aimed at controlling the narrative rather than uncovering the truth, transforming the hearings into a one-sided political maneuver rather than a credible legal process.

The most impactful moment of Bondi’s critique came when she addressed the obvious conflict of interest concerning Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

Bondi carefully detailed how Hunter Biden, lacking experience in energy or Ukrainian matters, was awarded an $83,000-per-month role at Burisma Holdings while his father, then Vice President, oversaw U.S. policy regarding Ukraine.

She highlighted inconsistencies in the statements made by the Bidens, illustrating how Joe Biden publicly stated he did not discuss Burisma with his son, while Hunter acknowledged informing his father about it.

Bondi also presented evidence that Biden had pushed for the dismissal of a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma, suggesting a connection to U.S. foreign aid in what appeared to be a clear abuse of power.

Senators Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, and Lindsey Graham questioned House managers about why these significant details were ignored during the impeachment inquiry.

Bondi charged Schiff with intentionally avoiding any examination of the Bidens while aggressively targeting Trump, labeling it a classic instance of political bias and selective justice.

Her speech reverberated through the chamber, leaving Schiff and his team at a loss for words.

While Schiff’s impeachment case was based on claims that Trump pressured Ukraine for personal political benefit, Bondi’s disclosures shifted attention back to Schiff’s role in hiding crucial evidence and manipulating the proceedings.

She argued that if Schiff genuinely cared about corruption, he would have investigated the Bidens instead of weaponizing impeachment for political purposes.

Ultimately, Bondi’s incisive critique bolstered the defense’s case, revealing the impeachment as a partisan endeavor rather than a legitimate constitutional process.

The Senate ultimately acquitted President Trump, delivering a final blow to Schiff’s efforts.

Bondi’s speech stands as a pivotal moment in the trial, a harsh denunciation of Schiff’s tactics, and a defense of constitutional fairness that echoed nationwide.