Focus on the BIG picture.
Friday, Dec 05, 2025
Outside the box.
Why Washington, D.C. Was Excluded as a 2026 World Cup Host Site
FIFA passed over the U.S. capital after rejecting the proposed stadium and bidding arrangement amid logistical concerns
When the 2026 FIFA World Cup hosts were announced, Washington, D.C. — though long considered a natural candidate — was not chosen to stage any matches.
The decision stems primarily from doubts over the suitability of D.C.’s stadium offering: the facility formerly known as FedEx Field, now called Northwest Stadium, was deemed substandard by visiting officials.
They highlighted problems including inconvenient location, outdated amenities, inadequate suite and media infrastructure, and overall failure to meet FIFA’s requirements.
In response, D.C. joined with Baltimore in a combined bid that proposed hosting matches at Baltimore’s M&T Bank Stadium while reserving D.C. for fan zones and support events.
This arrangement, however, was judged “awkward” and insufficient by the selection committee, and lost out to more robust bids — notably one from Boston backed by influential owners.
The rejection makes D.C. only the third national capital in World Cup history to miss out, after Bonn in 1974 and Tokyo in 2002, underlining the severity of the shortfall given its long football history — the region hosted World Cup games in 1994 among other major tournaments.
Despite the loss, the city is still scheduled to host the tournament’s final draw at the Kennedy Center in December 2025, signalling that while it fell short as a match venue, it will retain a symbolic role in the global event.
Meanwhile, some local authorities continue to explore long-term plans to rebuild a modern stadium at the site of the former Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium, with hopes of positioning D.C. for future major tournaments.
That project, however, is planned well beyond 2026, meaning the city must look elsewhere for now if it wants to return to the pitch as a World Cup host city.
The decision stems primarily from doubts over the suitability of D.C.’s stadium offering: the facility formerly known as FedEx Field, now called Northwest Stadium, was deemed substandard by visiting officials.
They highlighted problems including inconvenient location, outdated amenities, inadequate suite and media infrastructure, and overall failure to meet FIFA’s requirements.
In response, D.C. joined with Baltimore in a combined bid that proposed hosting matches at Baltimore’s M&T Bank Stadium while reserving D.C. for fan zones and support events.
This arrangement, however, was judged “awkward” and insufficient by the selection committee, and lost out to more robust bids — notably one from Boston backed by influential owners.
The rejection makes D.C. only the third national capital in World Cup history to miss out, after Bonn in 1974 and Tokyo in 2002, underlining the severity of the shortfall given its long football history — the region hosted World Cup games in 1994 among other major tournaments.
Despite the loss, the city is still scheduled to host the tournament’s final draw at the Kennedy Center in December 2025, signalling that while it fell short as a match venue, it will retain a symbolic role in the global event.
Meanwhile, some local authorities continue to explore long-term plans to rebuild a modern stadium at the site of the former Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium, with hopes of positioning D.C. for future major tournaments.
That project, however, is planned well beyond 2026, meaning the city must look elsewhere for now if it wants to return to the pitch as a World Cup host city.
